SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6307

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJESH GURALMAL NAGPAL – Appellant
Versus
RGA FRESH FRUIT PVT LTD & ANR. – Respondent


$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20.04.2026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 326/2026 RAJESH GURALMAL NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Advocate.

versus RGA FRESH FRUIT PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Sharma, Ms. Ritu Janjani and Mr. Nishant Shishodia, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (Oral)

1. The present Petition, under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, has been filed seeking extension of the time of mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator, which expired on 15.04.2026.

2. The material on record indicates that the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement [“Agreement”] on 18.02.2022, which contains an arbitration clause.

3. Upon disputes having arisen, the Petitioner invoked Arbitration vide notice dated 21.11.2022. However, the parties could not arrive at a consensus with respect to the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator. Hence, the Petitioner approached this Court under section 11(6) of the Act.

4. This Court vide Order dated 08.01.2024, appointed a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top