JUDGMENT

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

1. This appeal is filed against order dated 17.11.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Courts), Central, Tis Hazari Courts in CS (Comm) 554/2023. In the impugned order, the learned Commercial Court disposed of the Respondents’ application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908¹“CPC” hereinafter. The application was filed by the Respondents, as Plaintiffs in the suit, seeking an injunction to restrain the Appellants from using the mark “SHATAM JEEVA” and its associated symbols, which are registered and in use by the Appellants, i.e., “Shatam Jeeva” (Appellants’ registered mark) and “Shatam Jeeva By Baidyanath” (Appellants’ mark in use).

2. By the impugned order, the learned Commercial Court granted the relief as sought by the Plaintiffs. It issued an injunction restraining the Appellants, along with all others acting on their behalf from using the mark “SHATAM JEEVA”²Alternatively referred to as “impugned mark” or any other trademark that is identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks, namely “JIVA”. Furthermore, the Appellants have been restrained from engaging in any act tha