SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6342

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI


2026:DHC:3327


O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 32/2025 & I.A. 2644/2025 (Stay)


M/S CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner

Through: None.

versus

M/S AMMA AJIT HEALTH CARE PVT LTD & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through: Ms. Mani Gupta, Advocate.


CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR


Date of Decision : 21.04.2026

JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the following reliefs:

“In the facts and circumstances mentioned herein above it is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to:-

i. Appoint Sh. DUMPALA AMARNATH (Mob: 9032050678, Email: Dumpala.amarnath@elix.capital), Officer / Executive of the Petitioner Company as Receiver to take over the possession of the financed medical equipment mentioned below from the possession of the respondents, their agent, employee, guarantors, co borrowers or from anyone else who is/are in possession of the said financed machines/equipment and the receiver may be also allowed to take police assistance if necessary for the said purpose; and permit the receiver to look after the Management and up keep of the said subject property/financed machines/ medical equipment.

ii. Restrain Respondents, its heirs, agents, servants, employees, representatives etc. from disposing off, selling, alienating, dismantling or creating third party interest or from concealing the whole or any part of above referred hypothecated medical equipments.

iii. Direct the concerned SHO of the area where the subject property/financed machines/ medical equipment is found to help the receiver in taking possession of the subject property/ financed machines/ equipments and also provide the police help.

iv. Petitioner Company be allowed to further deal with the subject property/ financed machines/ medical equipment as per the order/direction of the Arbitral Tribunal.

v. Pass such other/further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the favor of Petitioner Company and against the respondent in the interest of justice.”

S.No. Equipment Model Manufacturer Dealer Units
1. ICU Ventilator for Adult, Pediatric Cardio Labs JS Industries 2
2. ICU Ventilator with both Invasive & Non- Invasive Cardio Labs JS Industries 3
3. Patient Monitor with Etco2 & Dual IBP Bird Medtech JS Industries 5
4. Multipara Patient Monitor Bird Medtech JS Industries 30
5. C-ARM Electro Manual Top Sliding OT Table JS Industries JS Industries 2
6. C-ARM Electro Manual Top Sliding OT Table Bionet JS Industries 3
7. Anesthesia Workstation with Ventilator Cardio Labs JS Industries 1
8. Anesthesia Work Station Cardio Labs JS Industries 1
9. Defibrillator 1000 HCT-Dual Powered Bionet JS Industries 3
10. LED OT Lights Cat Series JS Industries JS Industries 2
11. LED OT Light Single Dome JS Industries JS Industries 1
12. Laparoscopy Equipment Set Erbe - Germany JS Industries 1
13. Surgical Diathermy Enertec JS Industries 2
14. AeroScan CD25 Colour Doppler Ultrasound System Konica JS Industries 1
15. Video Laryngoscopy Bionet JS Industries 2
16. Fetal Monitor (7" Screen) Bionet JS Industries 1
17. X-Ray 250 MA Hi Free evince with Table Allengers JS Industries 1
18. DR System,35C Retrofit Care Stream JS Industries 1
19. C-ARM HF59 Plus Allengers JS Industries 1
20. Mobile X-Ray 30MA Allengers JS Industries 1

2. A perusal of the record would show that, by virtue of the Order dated 03.02.2025, certain interim directions were granted in favour of the Petitioner in the following terms:

“4. In the meantime, keeping in view the aforesaid, at this stage, the respondents, its heirs, agents, servants, employees, representatives etc. are restrained from disposing off, selling, alienating, dismantling or creating any third party interest or from concealing the whole or any part of above referred hypothecated medical equipments.”

3. A perusal of the Order Sheets further reveals that the matter has since remained pending before this Court, and no effective hearing seems to have taken place. In fact, at least on one occasion, it is recorded that the parties sought to reconcile their differences by resorting to Mediation. The Court is informed that the Mediation proceedings did not fructify.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top