SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6390

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Girish Kathpalia, J
LAXMI DEVI AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(CRL)-1307/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Pramod Kumar Dubey, Anirudh Gupta, Ashish Gupta, Satyam Sharma, Ram Chand
For the Respondents: Sanjeev Bhandari, Arjit Sharma, Sakshi Jha

Under Article 226, court can direct police to provide protection and remove provocative social media content, and dispose petition upon assurance of compliance.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, Article 226 - Writ petition seeking police protection and removal of inflammatory content from social media - Court disposed of petition after assurance by police that adequate measures including installation of CCTV cameras, police pickets, and removal of over 250 inflammatory videos have been taken - Further directions issued to provide personal mobile number of SHO to petitioners and to act upon specific particulars of remaining objectionable content. (Paras 4-7)

(B) Police Protection - Where petitioners face threat to life and liberty due to communal provocation, the court may rely on submissions of police regarding steps already taken and dispose of the petition with directions for continued vigilance and action. (Paras 4-8)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that on 13.04.2026, unknown women with covered faces threatened petitioner no. 1, and earlier on 09.04.2026, a person broke the lock of a house and took belongings. The petitioners sought police protection, removal of inflammatory videos from social media, and preventive measures. The petition was based on an incident already considered by a Division Bench in an earlier writ petition.

Findings of Court:
The court noted that the local police had already installed CCTV cameras in the lane and surrounding blocks, created police pickets, and removed over 250 inflammatory videos from social media. The court directed that the personal mobile number of the SHO be provided to the petitioners and that any specific particulars of remaining objectionable content be acted upon promptly. The complaint dated 13.04.2026 was being investigated by an ACP‑rank officer. In view of these assurances, the petitioners expressed satisfaction and the petition was disposed of.

Issues: (i) Whether the police had taken adequate steps to ensure the safety and security of the petitioners and to prevent communal tension. (ii) Whether the court should issue further directions for removal of inflammatory social media content.

Ratio Decidendi: In a writ petition for police protection, the court may accept the submissions of the police regarding measures already taken and dispose of the petition while issuing specific directions for continued action, including provision of direct contact to the SHO and prompt handling of remaining complaints.

Result: Petition disposed of.

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking following reliefs:

a) to ensure the safety and security to the family of petitioners by providing adequate police protection as there is grave threat to lives and liberty of the petitioners;

b) Direct the Respondents to take all necessary steps to ensure that no threat, coercion, or harm of any nature is extended to the Petitioners and the witnesses connected with FIR No. 0122/2026, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar;

c) Direct the Respondents to take immediate and effective action for the identification, removal, and deletion of all threatening, inflammatory, and communally provocative videos pertaining to the incident from all social media platforms, including but not limited to YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) to ensure that no untoward incident takes place due to the wide circulation of such videos; and

d) Issue appropriate directions to the Respondents to take all preventive and precautionary measures, to ensure that no untoward incident takes place against the Petitioners and the witnesses;

e) Pass such other and further order( s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.

2. Learned ASC for the State appearing on advance intimation accepts notice. Learned ASC is accompanied with Ms. Niharika Bhatt, the Additional DCP, Dwarka, Delhi. Learned ASC points out that earlier, an issue pertaining to the unfortunate incident on the basis whereof this petition has been brought, was taken before a Division Bench of this Court by way of W.P.(Crl.) 896/2026 and the same was disposed of by the Division Bench taking note of the previous orders passed therein. The learned Division Bench recorded appreciation for the Delhi Police for the manner in which directions in the said writ petition were implemented.

3. The present petition has been filed, alleging that on 13.04.2026, few unknown women with faces covered threatened the petitioner no. 1 and one of them was identified by petitioner no. 1 as Ms. ‘S’ (name withheld in this order). It is further alleged that on 09.04.2026, husband of Ms. ‘S’ had broken the lock of the gate of a house and he took away the belongings.

4. In the above backdrop, learned ASC submits that the local police is already active and shall ensure best possible protection to the petitioners. The Additional DCP explains that in the lane of residence of the petitioners as well as in the surrounding blocks, CCTV cameras have been installed and police pickets have been created to ensure communal harmony. As regards the petitioners, it is submitted by Additional DCP that there is a police picket just in front of their house.

5. Additionally, the Additional DCP is requested to direct the concerned SHO to provide his personal mobile phone number to the petitioners so that they may contact him at the time of distress.

6. As regards prayer ‘c’ of the petition, the Additional DCP informs that they have already pulled down more than 250 inflammatory videos and contents from social media platforms. Petitioners are directed to furnish specific particulars of such videos or content, if any to the local SHO, who shall forthwith take appropriate action in accordance with law.

7. As regards the complaint dated 13.04.2026, learned ASC submits on instructions that the local police has already collected relevant material including video footage, which is being examined for appropriate action. The same is being inquired into by an officer of ACP rank.

8. In view of above directions, learned Senior Counsel for petitioners, on instructions, submits that they are satisfied so far as this petition is concerned and the petition be accordingly disposed of.

9. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top