SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6391

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. – Respondent


$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 15.01.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 23.04.2026 + W.P.(C) 2804/2024 RAJBIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Dr. S. S. Hooda and Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Advs.

versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

J U D G M E N T

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

1. The present petition is filed under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 22.12.2023 (hereafter ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereafter ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 4276/2015. The Petitioner’s challenge to the rejection of his representation for grant of seniority from an earlier date was dismissed by the impugned order.

2. Succinctly stated, the Petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspector (Exe.) in the Delhi Police on 21.11.1991. In recognition of his service, he was granted an out-of-turn ad hoc promotion to the rank of Inspector (Exe.) on 17.02.1998 under Rule 19(ii) of the Delhi Police (Promotion & Confirmation) Rules, 1980 (hereafter ‘Delhi Police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top