SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6395

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PARVEEN KHANNA AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner Nos.1 & 2, who are the bhumidar/owner of the land measuring 0 Bigha 9 biswa (450 Sq. Yds.) each out of Khasra No.29/5/2 and Petitioner Nos. 3 & 4, who are the bhumidar/owner of the land measuring 1 bigha 06 biswa (1300 Sq. Yds.) each out of Khasra No.30/1/1 located in urbanized Village – Nagli Sakrawati, Delhi, have filed the present petition challenging the impugned orders dated 12th September, 2017 and 13th September, 2017 passed by the LAC/ADM (South West), Kapashera, New Delhi.

3. Vide the impugned orders, the reference petitions under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) filed by the Petitioners had been rejected as being barred by time.

4. The background of the case is that a notification u/s 4 of the Act dated 7th April, 2006 was issued for the acquisition of the subject land. Thereafter, a notification u/s 6 of the Act was issued on 4th April, 2007, declaring the acquisition of the land of the Petitioners for public purpose.

5. Vide award no. 13/2008- 09/SW dated 30th March, 2009, the land of the Petitioners was acquired and compensation was asse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top