SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6400

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICLAS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
OFFSHORE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED – Respondent


$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 23.04.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 273/2018 & I.A. 8624/2018 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICLAS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mani Gupta & Ms. Sonali Jain, Advs.

versus OFFSHORE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Dudeja, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL)

1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short „the Act‟) seeking setting aside of arbitral award dated 21.12.2017.

2. The short issue is that whether the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator is in violation of amended Section 12(5) of the Act.

3. The brief facts are that the petitioner was awarded a work contract by M/s HPCL Mittal Energy Limited, valuing Rs.15,97,99,800/-. The petitioner further gave a sub contract to the respondent vide Letter of Intent dated 28.05.2010. Dispute arose between the parties to the lis. Clause 33 of the General Conditions of Contract (for short „GCC‟) reproduced below provides for dispute resolution through arbitration.

“33.0 ARBITRATION: All disputes between the parties to the contract arising out of or in relation to the con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top