SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6438

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J
Ani Media Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Press Trust Of India Ltd. – Respondent
CS(COMM) 543/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Akshit Mago, Ekssha Kashyap
For the Respondents: Sumit Nagpal, Kamna S. Nagpal, Tanmay Saini, Kunal K., Sarthak Kapoor

A civil suit can be disposed of as withdrawn upon the recording of a lawful settlement agreement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Headnote:The present suit was instituted seeking a permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendant for copyright infringement regarding unauthorized reproduction of content. During the pendency of the suit, the parties entered into an amicable settlement. The court, having perused the terms of the settlement, found them to be lawful and recorded the settlement agreement between the parties. The issue for consideration was whether the court should grant leave to withdraw the suit based on the settlement reached between the parties. Guided by the principles of civil procedure contemplating the recording of lawful settlements, the court held that the parties are bound by the terms of the agreement, thus permitting the withdrawal. The suit stands disposed of as withdrawn with the entitlement of a refund of the court fees.

Table of Content
1. procedural context for seeking withdrawal of suit based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court oversight and disposal of suit based on lawful settlement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)

O R D E R

% 25.04.2026

1. Matter is taken up today as 03.03.2026 was declared holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.

I.A. 4522/2026

2. This application is filed jointly on behalf of the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording of settlement between parties for grant of leave to the Plaintiff to withdraw the suit.

3. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of permanent and mandatory injunction against Defendant No. 1 and all others acting on its behalf to take down certain infringing videos allegedly containing unauthorized reproduction of Plaintiff’s copyright content as also restraining the said Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from posting, publishing, republishing, uploading, distributing, circulating or otherwise exploiting any original or copyright content of the Plaintiff as also damages, amongst other reliefs.

4. During the pendency of the suit, parties have arrived at an amicable settlement incorporating the terms in a Settlement Agreement dated 20.11.2025 entered into between the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1, copy of which is appended to the application.

5. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of, recording the settlement between the parties.

CS(COMM) 543/2024 & I.A. 32334/2024

6. In light of Settlement Agreement between the parties, terms of which bind the parties thereto, Plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit.

7. Suit stands disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application.

8. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top