SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. – Respondent


$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23.04.2026 + ARB.P. 1782/2025 & I.A. 31638/2025 (Seeking permission for amendment of the memo of parties)

TATA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Kumar and Ms.

Ragini Kapoor, Advocates.

versus M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Khyati Jain, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Loan-cum-Guarantee Agreement dated 19.08.2023 [“Agreement”].

2. The material on record reflects that the Agreement stipulates a dispute resolution mechanism, which contemplates reference of disputes thereunder, inter se the parties, to Arbitration. The relevant stipulation is contained in Clause 12 of the Agreement [“Arbitration clause”]. The relevant portion of the same reads as follows:-

12. Arbitration If any dispute, difference or claim arises between any of the Obligors and the Lender in connection with the Facility or as to the in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top