SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S GYAN CHAND – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23.04.2026 + ARB.P. 697/2026 M/S GYAN CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Pandey and Mr.

Ramesh Pandey, Advocates.

versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Panel Counsel for PWD (GNCTD).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Agreement bearing No. 57/EE/SRDProject- 1/PWD/2024-2025 dated 19.12.2024 [“Agreement”], as executed between the parties.

2. The material on record reflects that the Agreement stipulates a dispute resolution mechanism, which contemplates reference of disputes thereunder, inter se the parties, to Arbitration. The relevant stipulation is contained in Clause 25 of the Agreement [“Arbitration Clause]. The relevant portion of the same reads as follows:-

Clause 25 Settlement of Conciliation and Arbitration.

Except where otherwise provided in the contract, all questions and disputes relating to the meaning of the sp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top