IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUMAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT (oral)
1 . When the matter was taken up on 16.02.2026, the following facts were recorded:-
1. “Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 177/2023 dated 25.03.2023, registered at P.S. Sagarpur, Delhi, under Section 363 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.
2. The charge-sheet has been filed and subsequently, Sections 366/376 of IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, 2012 (POCSO) were added.
3. According to the petitioner, he was in love with the victim and they both left their respective homes in Delhi and went to Bihar where they solemnized marriage on 29.03.2023, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at Maa Tara Mandir, Babu Tola, Banka, Bihar.
4. However, since the victim was found to be minor, she was brought back to Delhi by the police. Her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded in which she admitted that she had gone with the accused of her own free will and had even married him willingly.
5. However, keeping in mind the age of the victim, charge-sheet was filed before the learned Trial Court and charges have already been framed and even the statement of the vic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.