JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 531/2022 of Police Station Neb Sarai for offence under Section 406/420/34 IPC.

2. In the first call, none appeared for the accused/applicant, so matter was passed over awaiting the counsel for the accused/applicant.

3. In this second call, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks adjournment on the ground that the main counsel is not available. The vakalatnama bears names and signatures of three counsel. But even in second call, none of them has appeared. In view of further discussion, I find no reason to grant any further accommodation.

4. Broadly speaking, prosecution allegation against the accused/applicant is that he cheated widow of a Pulwama martyr, who was employed with CRPF. According to prosecution, the amount fraudulently obtained by the accused/applicant was Rs. 20,00,000/-, which was collected by him from the complainant de facto widow under the pretext of investing the same for her. The said amount was collected by way of an agreement dated 28.11.2018. But the accused/applicant, instead of investing the said amount, transferred the same in his personal bank account and withdrew the same in