SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6554

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NITESH ALIAS VINAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 610/2024 of Police Station Mundka West for offence under Section 309(4)/317(2)/ 309(6)/311/3(5) BNS.

2. Despite last order, status report was not filed. However, today IO/SI Deepak has appeared to assist the learned prosecutor.

3. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State.

4. Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that on 15.09.2024, a PCR call was received informing an armed robbery with the complainant de facto. The IO recorded statement of the complainant de facto, who alleged that two unknown persons robbed him of his motorcycle on gun point after hitting him with fist and fled the spot. On the basis of statement of the complainant de facto FIR was registered. In a separate incident in the area of Sector 23, Dwarka, the accused/applicant and his co-accused opened fire on an office, while riding the motorcycle of the complainant de facto and they demanded ransom. Thereafter, both accused persons were arrested in FIR No. 233/2024 of PS Sector-23, Dwarka. Subsequently, the accused persons were arrested in the present case on 19.09.2024.

5. On behalf of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top