Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Bansal, J
Sunil Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of the dispute regarding mobile tower installation on private property. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding structural safety, rule compliance, and investigation history. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. installation of mobile towers on private property requires intimation, not prior permission. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. iits classified as public entities for structural safety certification under telecom rules. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. compliance with procedural requirements under rule 15 of the row rules. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. injunctions barred for infrastructure projects; lack of evidence for health hazards. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. dismissal of the writ petition and disposal of pending applications. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to stop the ongoing installation of a mobile telecommunication tower (‘mobile tower’) being carried out by respondent no.6 on the terrace of the premises of respondent no.5 bearing H.No.408, Kh.No.60, Ambedkar Colony, Chattarpur, New Delhi-110074 (hereinafter ‘subject property’).
2. The petitioners are residents of the lo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
