SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BLACKBERRY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J

INTRODUCTION

1. This is an Appeal filed under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970 (“Act”) seeking quashing and setting aside of orders dated 11.10.2019 (“Impugned Order I”) and 05.03.2020 (“Impugned Order II”) passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (“Respondent / Controller”) under Section 15 of the Act (“Impugned Orders”) refusing the Patent Application No. 1976/DEL/2008 filed on 20.08.2008 titled as “COLOUR DIFFERENTIATING A PORTION OF A TEXT MESSAGE SHOWN IN A LISTING ON A HANDHELD COMMUNICATION DEVICE” (“Subject Application”).

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The Subject Application claims priority from European Patent Application No. 07117003.9 filed on 21.09.2007 (“EP Application”). The Subject Application and the request for examination for the same was filed on 20.08.2008. The Subject Application was published under Section 11(A) of the Act on 17.04.2009.

3. The Subject Application was examined, and First Examination Report was issued on 10.09.2014 (“FER”). The substantial objection raised in the FER relates to the claims lacking novelty under Section 2(1)(j) of the Act in view of the document EP1767008 (A1) (“D1”). The documents US6671718B1 (“

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top