SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BLACKBERRY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.04.2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 14/2022 BLACKBERRY LIMITED .....Appellant versus CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Ashutosh Upadhyaya and Mr. Sandeep Bhola, Advocates.

For the Respondent : Mr. P.S. Singh, CGSC with MR. Rajneesh Kr. Sharma, Ms. Minakshi Singh, Mr. Ashutosh Bharti and Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION

1. This is an Appeal filed under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970 (“Act”) seeking quashing and setting aside of orders dated 11.10.2019 (“Impugned Order I”) and 05.03.2020 (“Impugned Order II”) passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (“Respondent / Controller”) under Section 15 of the Act (“Impugned Orders”) refusing the Patent Application No. 1976/DEL/2008 filed on 20.08.2008 titled as “COLOUR DIFFERENTIATING A PORTION OF A TEXT MESSAGE SHOWN IN A LISTING ON A HANDHELD COMMUNICATION DEVICE”

(“Subject Application”).

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The Subject Application claims priority from European Patent Application No. 07117003.9 fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top