Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
Arjun Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Artist Booking Company – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural compliance and interlocutory applications for discovery and exemptions in commercial suits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 2. establishing the plaintiff's public status and protectable personality attributes. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. assessment of personality rights infringement and the necessity of interim injunctive relief. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 4. specific injunctive directions and procedural orders regarding suit management. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
I.A. 11962/2026 (Seeking discovery, inspection of defendant’s documents)
1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XI Rules 1, 3 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (‘CC Act’) read with Section 151 of CPC, seeking discovery, production and inspection of the defendants’ documents.
2. Issue Notice.
3. Let the reply to the application be filed within a period of four weeks from date. R
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
