$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 344/2026 TOPRANKERS EDTECH SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED &

ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankur Khandelwal, Mr. Chirag Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Saurabh and Mr. Sidhhi, Advocates.

versus LPT EDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. ....Defendants Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 13.04.2026 I.A. 8768/2026 (Additional Documents)

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as‘CPC’) as applicable to commercial suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as‘CC Act’) seeking leave to place on record additional documents.

2. The plaintiffs are permitted to file additional documents in accordance with the provisions of the CC Act and the Delhi High Court (Original Side)

Rules, 2018.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 8769/2026 (Pre-Institution Mediation)

4. This is an application filed by the plaintiffs seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation Mediation under Section 12A of the CC Act.

5. As the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar vs. T.K.D. Keerthi: (2024) 5 SCC 815, exemption from the requirement of pre-institution Mediation is granted.

6. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 8770/2026 (Seeking time to file deficient Court fees)

7. The present application has been filed by the plaintiffs under Section 149 read with Section 151 of CPC, seeking permission to make good the deficiency, if any, in the Court Fee already paid.

8. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. Plaintiffs are directed to make good the deficiency of the Court Fee already affixed within one 2 weeks from date.

9. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 8771/2026 (Exemption)

10. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Section 151 of CPC seeking exemption from filing fair typed copies of documents along with the captioned suit.

11. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. However, fair, typed and legible copies of the documents with proper margins be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the defendants.

12. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 8772/2026 (Exemption from filing lengthy synopsis and list of dates)

13. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Section 151 of CPC seeking exemption from filing the synopsis and list of dates within the prescribed limit of five pages.

14. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

15. The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 8767/2026 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2, CPC)

16. Present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of CPC, 1908 seeking ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants.

17. Plaintiff no.1 claims to be a leading educational company providing offline and online coaching, educational resources and test preparation services for various competitive exams in India. Its brands include “Toprankers”, “LegalEdge”, “Creative Edge”, “Judiciary Gold” and “SuperGrads”. Plaintiff no.2 is stated to be the franchisee of plaintiff no.1 with a significant presence in Delhi and has its principal place of business in Delhi. Its centres in Delhi are located in Connaught Place, Dwarka, Pitampura and New Delhi South Extension. Plaintiff no.3 is stated to be a minor girl aged 17 years, and a resident of Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. She is stated to have secured All India Rank 1 in CLAT 2026.

18. Plaintiff no.1 claims that during the financial year 2024-25, approximately 2266 (offline and online) students were enrolled across the Delhi-NCR region. It is claimed that as of January 2026, the plaintiff no.1 has generated revenue of approximately Rs.17.70 Crores for FY 2025-26. Plaintiff no.1 claims that the said revenue constitutes approximately 60% of its total revenue