SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6740

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LEENA PAULOSE – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. By way of this application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”], read with Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [“PMLA”], the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with ECIR/54/DLZO-II/2021, dated 08.08.2021, under Sections 3 and 4 of the PMLA.

2. I have heard Mr. Anant Malik, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Vivek Gurnani, learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement [“ED”]. The counter affidavit of the respondent is also on record.

A. PROSECUTION CASE

3. The prosecution case, as it emerges from the material on record, is summarised hereinbelow:

A. The genesis of the present ECIR lies in an investigation pertaining to another ECIR/DLZO-II/05/2019 [“the 2019 ECIR”], related to Religare Finvest Limited. During the investigation in respect of the 2019 ECIR, it was found that one Ms. Aditi Singh had made certain financial transactions, on the basis of which she was summoned on 17.06.2021. Her statement was recorded under Section 50 of the PMLA, and she tendered her mobile phone.

B. After CDR and technical analysis of her phone, it was revealed that she was getting calls, purportedly from Go

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top