IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DHRUV SEHGAL – Appellant
Versus
ROMA SACHDEVA & ORS. – Respondent
JUDGEMENT (ORAL)
1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199611 Act, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter se parties, arising out of the Collaboration Agreement dated 03.04.201922 Agreement.
2. The said Agreement contains an Arbitration Clause, being Clause 33, which reads as under:
“33. That in case any difference of opinion arising between the parties in regard to the interpretation of the scope of this Agreement both the parties shall resolve the said dispute through an Arbitrator at Delhi to be appointed by both the parties with mutual consent.”
3. The material on record further indicates that the statutory requirement under Section 21 of the Act stands satisfied vide Notice dated 07.11.2024.
4. At the outset, this Court takes note of the fact that vide Order dated 18.09.2025, Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have been deleted from the array of parties in the present Petition. Accordingly, the disputes herein are confined to the Petitioner and Respondent No. 4.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 4 vehemently raises objections to the reference of the disputes, inter se pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.