SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6827

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. MAYANK MANN – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN LAL GUPTA & ANR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961Act, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Agreements to Sell dated 05.08.2024 and 04.09.20242Agreements.

2. Material on record reflects that the Agreements envisage a dispute resolution clause, being Clause 15, which reads as under:

"15. That in case any dispute arises between the parties regarding the sale of the said property in future, then the parties shall appoint an ARBITRATOR solely at the discretion of SECOND PARTY / BUYER, who will decide the disputed matter and whose decision shall be final and binding on both the parties as per provision of Indian Arbitration act, as amended up to date."

3. Material on record further indicates that the Notice under Section 21 of the Act came to be issued by the Petitioner on 11.12.2025.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents objects to the maintainability of the present Petition, contending that the Agreements are unregistered documents and, therefore, the arbitration clause contained therein is unenforceable.

5. This Court is of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top