SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NASIMUDDIN ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
SATISH SINGH IRSME – Respondent


SACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/non-compliance with the directions contained in the order dated 20.09.2019 passed in W.P.(C) 11767/2016. The said order reads as under:

CM APPL. 41040/2019 (for modification)

1. This is an application by the Petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 25th October 2018 passed by this Court.

2. In the said order this Court had, inter alia, concluded in para 14 that given the fact that the charges against the Petitioner had only been partly proved and to a limited extent, and the Petitioner not having been held responsible for causing any monetary loss to the Government, there was no occasion for the imposition of a penalty different from the one awarded to Mr. V. V. Rao SC (ENM) who was also proceeded against and who was the Petitioner’s superior discharging a higher responsibility than the Petitioner.

3. In paragraph 12 of the order dated 25th October, 2018 this Court had recorded that the penalty imposed on Mr. V.V. Rao was that of ‘censure’. This was apparently a mistake. Enclosed with the present application is a copy of an order dated 25th October 2002 in the cas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top