SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6860

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DANONE ASIA PACIFIC HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ROCKWELL PHARMACEUTICALS & ORS. – Respondent


TEJAS KARIA, J. (ORAL)

I.A. 12915/2026

1. This Application has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff under Order XIII A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking Summary Judgment against Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

2. The present Suit has been filed by the Plaintiff, inter alia, seeking permanent injunction retraining the Defendants from infringement of the Plaintiff’s Trade Mark and passing off.

3. Vide order dated 16.10.2024, this Court granted injunction restraining Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 from using the Mark ‘PROTEX’ (“Impugned Mark No. 1”), and Defendant Nos. 4 to 6 from using the Mark ‘PROTRILEX’ (“Impugned Mark No. 2”), or any other Mark that is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s registered Mark ‘PROTINEX’ (‘Plaintiff’s Mark’). Further, the Court issued summons to the Defendants in the present Suit.

4. Vide order dated 28.02.2025, this Court issued fresh summons to the Defendants through all permissible modes, upon the Plaintiff taking requisite steps.

5. Vide order dated 08.08.2025, the learned Joint Registrar observed that the affidavit of service dated 21.04.2025 records that service of summons on Defendant No. 1 had been effected on 19.04.2025, and anot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top