IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHRI RAJENDER KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SHRI HARI KRISHAN AGGARWAL – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed against the judgment dated 28.03.2024 whereby the learned ADJ has upheld the judgment dated 06.06.2023 of learned Civil Judge who had dismissed the Suit for Possession, Damages, Mesne Profits and Permanent Injunction on the ground as being not maintainable, because of the bar under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the “DRC Act”).
2. The plaintiff/Appellant Sh. Rajender Kumar Sharma had filed a Suit bearing CS No.1068/2022 for Possession, Damages, Mesne Profits and Permanent Injunction.
3. Facts in brief, as stated in the plaint, are that Plaintiff/Appellant is the owner/landlord of property bearing No. 2617, Gali No. 4, Mahavir Block, Bhola Nath Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Suit Property”) by virtue of Relinquishment Deed dated 25.06.2011 executed by other family members, in his favour in respect of the Suit Property. Even otherwise, the Suit for possession has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Karkardooma, wherein th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.