SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6991

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHRI RAJENDER KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SHRI HARI KRISHAN AGGARWAL – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed against the judgment dated 28.03.2024 whereby the learned ADJ has upheld the judgment dated 06.06.2023 of learned Civil Judge who had dismissed the Suit for Possession, Damages, Mesne Profits and Permanent Injunction on the ground as being not maintainable, because of the bar under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the “DRC Act”).

2. The plaintiff/Appellant Sh. Rajender Kumar Sharma had filed a Suit bearing CS No.1068/2022 for Possession, Damages, Mesne Profits and Permanent Injunction.

3. Facts in brief, as stated in the plaint, are that Plaintiff/Appellant is the owner/landlord of property bearing No. 2617, Gali No. 4, Mahavir Block, Bhola Nath Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Suit Property”) by virtue of Relinquishment Deed dated 25.06.2011 executed by other family members, in his favour in respect of the Suit Property. Even otherwise, the Suit for possession has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Karkardooma, wherein th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top