SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SHAIL JAIN, J.

1. The present Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the Award dated 22nd March, 2014 (hereinafter also referred to as ‘impugned Award’), passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, arising out of Industrial Dispute (I.D.) No. 14/11 between the Respondent/Claimant and the Petitioner/Management, whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the Respondent/Claimant's claim and subsequently directed the Petitioner/Management to consider the Respondent/Claimant's case for Compassionate Appointment on the merits.

2. The present dispute arises from the claim raised by the Respondent seeking appointment on compassionate grounds consequent upon the demise of his father, who was employed by the Petitioner Organisation. The Respondent’s request for compassionate appointment, having not been acceded to at the departmental level, the appropriate Government referred the industrial dispute for adjudication to the learned Industrial Tribunal on the issue as to whether the demand for compassionate appointment was justified. Upon adjudication, the learned Tribunal passed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top