IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SHAIL JAIN, J.
1. The present Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the Award dated 22nd March, 2014 (hereinafter also referred to as ‘impugned Award’), passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, arising out of Industrial Dispute (I.D.) No. 14/11 between the Respondent/Claimant and the Petitioner/Management, whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the Respondent/Claimant's claim and subsequently directed the Petitioner/Management to consider the Respondent/Claimant's case for Compassionate Appointment on the merits.
2. The present dispute arises from the claim raised by the Respondent seeking appointment on compassionate grounds consequent upon the demise of his father, who was employed by the Petitioner Organisation. The Respondent’s request for compassionate appointment, having not been acceded to at the departmental level, the appropriate Government referred the industrial dispute for adjudication to the learned Industrial Tribunal on the issue as to whether the demand for compassionate appointment was justified. Upon adjudication, the learned Tribunal passed the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.