SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S CRI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PRAN NATH MEHTA & ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the original defendant under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”).

2. The present appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 29th May, 2025 (hereinafter referred to as the “impugned judgment”) passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court, Tis Hazari Courts, Central District, Delhi in Civil Suit (Commercial) No. 3996/2021.

3. By the aforesaid impugned judgment, the suit preferred by the respondent-plaintiff came to be decreed. A declaration was granted that:

a) the defendant is not a statutory tenant under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the “DRC Act”), and that the Commercial Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit as per Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (hereinafter referred to as the “TP Act”),

b) the suit is not barred by the provision of Section 50 of the DRC Act.

c) the suit cannot be said to be not maintainable in view of non-compliance of Section 12A of the Commercial Court Act, 2015.

d) the learned Commercial Court has further held that the respondent-plaintiff i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top