J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. Both these petitions, being connected, have been taken up together.

2. Petitioners, in both the cases, seek quashing of respective FIRs on the basis of amicable settlement between the parties.

3. The parties are closely related to one another.

4. CRL.M.C. 3869/2026 relates to FIR No.527/2021 dated 23.11.2021 which was registered at P.S. Kirti Nagar on the basis of statement made by daughter-in-law of petitioner No.3-Tajinder Kaur. As per the allegations appearing in the abovesaid FIR, she claimed that the accused persons had caught hold of her and threatened her. When her husband came to her rescue and confronted them, he was also not spared and was threatened to be eliminated. He was also told that his wife i.e. respondent No.2 would be sexually assaulted. Charge-sheet has already been filed, albeit, charges are yet to be framed.

5. The other connected case i.e. CRL.M.C. 3895/2026 relates to FIR 528/2021 registered on the same day with the same police station. Respondent No.2 therein alleged that her nephew-Satinder Singh, his wife and others were abusing her as well as her other relatives and entered into scuffle with them and her chunni was pulled by them an