J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. Both these petitions, being connected, have been taken up together.

2. These are cross-FIRs and both the sides seek quashing of respective FIRs on the basis of amicable settlement between the parties.

3. Parties are also related to each other.

4. CRL.M.C.3915/2026 seeks quashing of FIR No.354/2012 dated 01.11.2012 registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj South for commission of offences under Section 451/323/34 IPC. There are five accused persons in the abovesaid FIR and FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint made by respondent No.5 i.e. Ravinder wherein he claimed that on 30.10.2012, the petitioners were quarreling and abusing his wife and Komal i.e. daughter of his sister-in-law. There was previous enmity between them as said case is at the stage of prosecution evidence and the accused persons have been charged for offences under Section 452/323/34 IPC.

5. CRL.M.C.3954/2026 seeks quashing of FIR No.355/2012 dated 01.11.2012 registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj South for commission of offences under Section 323/341/34 IPC. There are two accused in the abovesaid case and FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint made by respondent No.2 i.e. Sajjan Kumar, who claim