SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRADEEP KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

1. The present writ petition arises out of order dated 31.01.20251“Impugned order”, hereinafter passed in Original Application2“OA”, hereinafter No. 3834/2017, whereby the learned Central Administrative Tribunal3“Tribunal”, hereinafter had allowed the aforesaid O.A. and directed the Respondent to re-fix the Grade Pay of the Petitioners on notional basis and pension order but restricted the arrears to only for three years preceding the date of filing of the said O.A. in light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India and Others v. Tarsem Singh4(2008) 8 SCC 648.

2. The Petitioners have assailed the Impugned Order only to the extent of the direction passed by the learned Tribunal of restricting the benefit to only three years preceding the filing of the underlying O.A.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the O.A. No. 3834/2017 are set out below.

4. The Petitioners were initially appointed as Vaccinators, the post which was subsequently re-designated as Public Health Inspectors5“PHIs”, hereinafter in the office of the Respondent.

5. As per the office order dated 31.05.2005 issued by the Respondent, the pay scales of the supervisory staff sto

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top