SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7120

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S VISTAAR MEDIA WORKS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ONE97 COMMUNICATIONS LTD. AND ANR. – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

CM APPL. 34724/2026 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CM(M) 1192/2026 &CM APPL. 34725/2026 (for stay)

3. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 24th February, 2026 passed by the learned Trial Court in CS DJ No. 8682/2016, whereby the right of the petitioner/defendant No.1 to cross-examine PW-1 has been closed.

4. Heard. Record perused.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent has appeared on advance notice and accepts notice.

6. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the learned trial Court has closed the right of the petitioner/defendant No.1 to cross-examine PW-1 without appreciating the facts of the case as the denial of such opportunity would cause grave prejudice to the case of the petitioner. It is further argued that the petitioner be granted one more opportunity to cross-examine PW-1, as it is necessary for the proper adjudication of the matter.

7. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 has argued that sufficient op

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top