SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJ KUMAR @ PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.

1. In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, accused no. 1 (A1) in SC No. 33/2014 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-II (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi, assails the judgment and order on sentence dated 26.09.2015 as per which he has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC).

CRL.A. 35/2016 Page 2 of 33

2. The prosecution case is that on 23.03.2013 at about 10:30 p.m., at U.T. Block Chowk, Mangol Puri, Delhi, both the accused persons, namely, A1 and A2, caused grievous injuries toPW8 and PW9 with a sharp-edged weapon on their faces and other body parts with such intention or knowledge and under such circumstances that, had death been caused, they would have been guilty of murder. Hence, as per the charge-sheet/final report, the accused persons are alleged to have committed the offences punishable under Sections 307 read with 34 IPC.

3. On the basis of Ext.PW7/A FIS/FIR of PW12, given on 24.03.2013, Crime no. 199/2019, Mangol Puri Police Station, that is, Ext.PW2/B FIR was registered by PW2, Head

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top