IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMAR PURI – Appellant
Versus
SAMAR S PURI (D) THR LRS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) is directed against the order dated 18.09.2024, passed by the Trial Court, whereby the suit was held to be a Commercial Suit and the plaint was returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
2. The facts, in a nutshell, are that in the plaint, the plaintiff had asserted that Commercial/industrial Shed bearing No.6A, D.D.A Sheds, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi (hereinafter the „suit property‟) was allotted to him by DDA in an Auction held on 30.10.1981, whereafter he became its exclusive owner on payment of the sale consideration. A Possession Letter dated 04.08.1982 was also issued in his name. Thereafter, the suit property was used by the plaintiff as the office of his partnership firm namely, “M/s DESCON India”. It was further claimed that the defendant, who is the elder brother of the plaintiff, was running his partnership firm in the name of “M/s Associated Engineers” from the adjacent premises bearing Shed No. 5-A, D.D.A Sheds, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi and requested the plaintiff to permit him to use the portion of suit property.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.