SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7284

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SATISH KUMAR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S BALKRISHAN COMMERCIAL CO. LTD. & ANR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MINI PUSHKARNA, J.

I.A. 894/2019 in CS(OS) 635/2018

1. The present application has been filed by defendant no. 1 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), read with Article 53 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (“Limitation Act”), seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the suit is barred by limitation.

2. The suit in question, i.e., CS(OS) 635/2018 has been filed for recovery, declaration/cancellation and permanent injunction in relation to the Sale Deed dated 28th December, 2016 (“Sale Deed”), which pertains to the land comprising in Kh. No. 3/13 (4-16) and 3/14/1 (2-13), measuring 7 Bighas 9 Biswas, situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Dichaun Kalan, Delhi.

3. It is the case of defendant no. 1 that the suit is hopelessly barred by time as the plaintiffs themselves have made a case in their plaint that they were entitled to receive an alleged cash amount on 24th August, 2015, which was to be paid by defendant no. 1. Therefore, cause of action, if any, arose between the parties on the said date, i.e., 24th August, 2015, and as the present suit has been filed on 29th November, 2018, i.e., beyond a period of three years, the suit is liab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top