IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
MS KIRAN NAITHANI – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
CM APPL. 1521/2025
1. Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 18 days, in filing the present Appeal.
2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 18 days in filing the Appeal is condoned.
3. Application stands disposed of.
RFA 23/2025:
4. The present Regular First Appeals under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘C.P.C.’) have been preferred by the Appellant, Mr. Pradeep, assailing the Judgment and Decree dated 21.08.2024, whereby the Suit for Recovery preferred by the Plaintiff/Respondent, Ms. Kiran Naithani, has been decreed in the sum of Rs.4,38,100/- along with interest @ 5% per annum from the date of institution of this Suit, i.e. 24.09.2021, till realization.
5. The Counter Claim instituted by the Defendant/Appellant, Mr.Pradeep, seeking Recovery of Rs.1,50,000/-, was also simultaneously dismissed, by the same judgement.
6. The Plaintiff filed CS DJ ADJ No.678/2021, for recovery of ₹4,38,100/- along with pendente lite and future interest @ 18% p.a.
7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.