SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7290

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
MS KIRAN NAITHANI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

CM APPL. 1521/2025

1. Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 18 days, in filing the present Appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 18 days in filing the Appeal is condoned.

3. Application stands disposed of.

RFA 23/2025:

4. The present Regular First Appeals under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘C.P.C.’) have been preferred by the Appellant, Mr. Pradeep, assailing the Judgment and Decree dated 21.08.2024, whereby the Suit for Recovery preferred by the Plaintiff/Respondent, Ms. Kiran Naithani, has been decreed in the sum of Rs.4,38,100/- along with interest @ 5% per annum from the date of institution of this Suit, i.e. 24.09.2021, till realization.

5. The Counter Claim instituted by the Defendant/Appellant, Mr.Pradeep, seeking Recovery of Rs.1,50,000/-, was also simultaneously dismissed, by the same judgement.

6. The Plaintiff filed CS DJ ADJ No.678/2021, for recovery of ₹4,38,100/- along with pendente lite and future interest @ 18% p.a.

7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top