J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules, 1996, has been filed on behalf of the Appellants against the Judgment dated 26.06.2020, whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff/Respondent for Recovery of Rs.2,91,031/- along with the pendente lite and future interest @12% p.a., has been decreed.

2. The Plaintiff/Respondent had filed a Civil Suit bearing CS DJ No. 207727/2016 for Recovery of Rs.4,02,808/- along with pendente lite and future interest.

3. The facts in brief are that the Plaintiff, a sole-proprietorship concern, was engaged in the business of providing security guards. On the request of the Defendants for providing the security services, they entered into an Agreement dated 30.10.2009 and the security guards were provided at the various establishments of the Defendants.

4. The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendants failed to make payment against certain Invoices and bills to the tune of Rs.3,91,031/-. A cheque of Rs.2,09,267/- was given on behalf of the Defendants though, on presentation, it was