Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
Kumar Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
Neelima Thakur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of tenancy, subsequent lease extensions, and the appellant's claim of an oral agreement to sell. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. procedural history, framing of issues, and grounds of appeal regarding the trial court's dismissal of arbitration and order on admissions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 3. case law citations and arguments regarding the threshold for granting a decree under order xii rule 6 cpc and the impact of a parallel specific performance suit. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 4. evidence analysis highlighting the lack of registration for the alleged agreement and the persistence of tenant status. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 5. legal requirements for part-performance under section 53a tpa for protection against eviction. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 6. final outcome: tenancy status persists until a decree for specific performance is actually executed. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
