Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
Devangana Kalita – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi Nct – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order denying inspection of malkhana documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner asserts right to fair trial and access to un-relied documents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. respondent contends interlocutory nature of order bars regular challenge. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. high court maintains jurisdictional power to prevent miscarriage of justice. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. fair trial rights under article 21 mandate access to un-relied material. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77) |
| 6. right to inspect un-relied documents granted to ensure trial fairness. (Para 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82) |
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
W.P. (CRL.) 925/2025: To seek Inspection of Malkhana for un-relied Documents:
1. A Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 528/529 of BNSS, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner to challenge the Order dated 07.12.2024 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
