Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
Deepak Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kaushik – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellate procedure regarding rejection of plaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. basis of family claims and property ownership disputes. (Para 3 , 17) |
| 3. defendants' response regarding ownership and maintainability of the suit. (Para 18 , 26) |
| 4. applicability of order vii rule 11 regarding non-registration and benami act. (Para 27 , 31) |
| 5. plaintiff's contention on validity and necessity of registration for family arrangements. (Para 32 , 36) |
| 6. trial court's initial finding on the necessity of registration. (Para 37 , 39) |
| 7. grounds for appeal challenging the application of registration bar. (Para 40 , 47) |
| 8. redefining the core issues: registration requirement and benami status. (Para 48 , 52) |
| 9. legal standard for family settlements, registration requirements, and estoppel. (Para 53 , 77) |
| 10. determination that the specific 2009 settlement instrument required registration. (Para 78 , 81) |
| 11. admissibility of unregistered family settlements for collateral purposes based on subsequent conduct. (Para 82 , 87) |
| 12. final confirmation of trial court's decision to reject plaint. (Para 88 , 90) |
| 13. dismissal of the regular first appeal. (Para 91) |
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
