SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ASTRAL LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ASTRAL MARKETING SYNDICATE & ANR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J

I.A. 16193/2025

1. The present Application has been filed by Defendant No. 1 / Applicant under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking rejection of the Plaint filed by the Plaintiff.

SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT / DEFENDANT NO. 1:

2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant / Defendant No. 1 advanced the following submissions:

2.1. The Plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC on the grounds that this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present Suit.

2.2. Under Section 20 of the CPC, a Suit may be instituted only where the defendants reside, carry on business, or where the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. In the present case, Defendant No. 1 carries on business exclusively at Ahmedabad, as is acknowledged by the Plaintiff in the Memorandum of Parties to the Plaint as well as in the supporting documents placed on record. Further, the Plaintiff’s principal place of business is also situated in Ahmedabad. Accordingly, this Court dees not have the territorial jurisdiction to try the present Suit.

2.3. The Plaintiff has sought to invoke the jurisdicti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top