SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7343

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KHATIZA BEGAM – Appellant
Versus
SALMA KHAN – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.10.2024 passed in RCA No. 1157/2024, whereby the learned ADJ set aside the Judgment dated 30/04/2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge dismissing the Suit for Possession, arrears of rent & injunction, and decreed the Suit of the Plaintiff.

2. The Plaintiff had filed a Civil Suit bearing CS No. 27266/2016 for Possession, arrears of rent, mesne profit & permanent Injunction in respect of F-206, Phase- II, Sector- 3, Pappan Kalan, New Delhi- 110075 (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟).

3. The facts as narrated in the Plaint, are that the Plaintiff claimed to be the absolute owner and person in possession of property bearing no. F-206, Phase-II, Sector-3, Pappan Kalan, New Delhi- 110075 (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟). According to the plaintiff, the suit property had been purchased from Sh. Ram Lal S/o Sh. Chelaji, the original owner/allottee, by virtue of duly notarized General Power of Attorney, Agreement to Sell, Affidavit, Receipt,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top