IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KHATIZA BEGAM – Appellant
Versus
SALMA KHAN – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.10.2024 passed in RCA No. 1157/2024, whereby the learned ADJ set aside the Judgment dated 30/04/2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge dismissing the Suit for Possession, arrears of rent & injunction, and decreed the Suit of the Plaintiff.
2. The Plaintiff had filed a Civil Suit bearing CS No. 27266/2016 for Possession, arrears of rent, mesne profit & permanent Injunction in respect of F-206, Phase- II, Sector- 3, Pappan Kalan, New Delhi- 110075 (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟).
3. The facts as narrated in the Plaint, are that the Plaintiff claimed to be the absolute owner and person in possession of property bearing no. F-206, Phase-II, Sector-3, Pappan Kalan, New Delhi- 110075 (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟). According to the plaintiff, the suit property had been purchased from Sh. Ram Lal S/o Sh. Chelaji, the original owner/allottee, by virtue of duly notarized General Power of Attorney, Agreement to Sell, Affidavit, Receipt,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.