SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7345

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S SHYAM LAL & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MITHLESH DEVI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) has been filed against impugned Judgment dated 22.05.2018, whereby learned First Appellate Court has upheld the Judgment and Decree dated 19.01.2017 whereby learned Civil Judge, dismissed the Civil Suit of the Plaintiff / Respondent /Smt. Mithlesh Devi for Declaration, Mandatory and Permanent Injunction.

2. The plaintiff/Appellant had filed a Suit bearing No.427021/2016, seeking for Declaration, Mandatory and Permanent Injunction.

3. Brief facts, as stated in the Plaint, were that the Plaintiff was real and absolute owner of the Property bearing No. WZ-12B, Gulab Bagh Nawada, New Delhi. One Shop bearing No.3, on the Ground Floor of Suit Property, admeasuring 8.4 x 14 ft., (hereinafter referred to as ‘Suit Property’)was let out to Defendant / Appellant No.1, M/s Shyam Lal & Sons, vide Rent Agreement dated 01.01.2001, for shoe business.

4. Initially, the rent was agreed as Rs.1,000/-per month, but thereafter, rent was enhanced to Rs.1,460/- per month excluding water, electricity and other charges, payable by Appellant No.1 as per uti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top