SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Saurabh Banerjee, J
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Govt Of Nct Delhi – Respondent
CRL.M.C. 2936/2026 | CRL.M.C. 2937/2026 | CRL.M.C. 2970/2026 | CRL.M.C. 2971/2026 | CRL.M.C. 2972/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abhinav Sharma, Mahender Shukla
For the Respondents: Meenakshi Dahiya, Vanshika Singh, Bhanu Pratap Singh, Tanmay Mehta, Rajeev Aggarwal, Manbhar Mittal, Ankit Gupta

The court maintains discretion to grant adjournments in the interest of justice when the lead counsel is unavailable.

Headnote:The case involves a request for an adjournment by the petitioner on the grounds of non-availability of the arguing counsel. The court, in the interest of justice, granted the adjournment. The primary issue concerns the management of court proceedings and accommodation of counsel availability. The court exercised its discretion to facilitate proper representation for the petitioner. The matter is renotified to a later date.

Table of Content
1. court discretion in granting adjournments for counsel unavailability. (Para 1 , 2)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 20.04.2026

1. Since learned counsel for the petitioner seeks adjournment on the ground that the arguing counsel is not available for the day, in the interest of justice, renotify on 23.04.2026.

2. A copy of this order be kept in all the connected matters.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top