SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10567

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS VS. SUHAIL FASIH


O R D E R

CM APPL. 26206/2026 & CM APPL. 26208/2026 (for exemption)

1. Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(C) 5340/2026

3. This writ petition is directed against an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1“the Tribunal” hereinafter by which a review application filed by the respondents, after three years of the judgement under challenge, has been allowed and the OA has been directed to be re-listed for hearing.

4. From a reading of the impugned judgment, no cogent reason appears to be forthcoming either for condoning the delay of three years in filing the review petition. Nor does the order record any finding of the existence of any error apparent on the face of the record or any of the other considerations which govern review.

5. The only ground on which the judgment in the OA has been withdrawn and OA has been directed to be re-listed is that there are certain aspects which require re-consideration.

6. We are doubtful whether the review application would have been allowed in such a manner.

7. Accordingly, issue notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued.

8. Notice is accepted on behalf of the Respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top