IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J
Axis Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rahil Akhtar Ansari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. existence of a valid arbitration agreement and respondent default. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. s. 21 notice compliance and the power of the court to appoint an arbitrator. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”), seeking appointment of a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties, which arise out of the Loan Agreement dated 03rd December, 2021.
2. Notice had been issued to the respondent on the last date of hearing.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit of service, in order to show that service upon the respondent, has been effected through WhatsApp as well as E-mail. He confirms the fact that service through said modes has been done on the valid E-mail and Mobile Number, which had been submitted by the respondent himself in the loan application.
4. Accordingly, the respondent stands served. However, none appears for the respondent when the matter is called out.
5. Thus, this Court proceeds to deal with the present petition.
6. As per the facts on record, the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.