Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J
City Super Market – Appellant
Versus
Kapil Tandon – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context for interim fixation of occupation charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidentiary arguments regarding market rental rates based on comparable properties. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court-approved consensual interim arrangement for monthly charges. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
O R D E R
22.04.2026
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
RC.REV. 34/2026 & CM APPL. 6925/2026
2. The present order deals with payment of use and occupation charges of the demised premises during the pendency of the present petition. This Court while issuing notice in the present petition vide order dated 11.02.2026 had noted the submission of learned counsel for the respondent that execution proceedings shall not be filed till the next date of hearing, and had granted liberty to the parties to file documents for determination of use and occupation charges. Such documents have been placed on record by both the parties.
3. Learned counsels for the petitioner/applicant and respondents/non applicants have placed on record certified copies of their respective lease deeds for the determination of use and occupation charges. The following lease deeds along with their
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
