Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 11807
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
DR BRIJ BHUSHAN VS. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 151/2021 | I.A. 12776/2026 | C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 115/2022 | I.A. 12754/2026 | C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 55/2022 | I.A. 12777/2026 | C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 78/2022 | I.A. 12755/2026 | C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 87/2022 | I.A. 12775/2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Priya Adlakha
For the Respondents: Rajat Jain, Ankush Mangal, Nishant Gautam, V. Negi, Vibhav V. Nath
The court allowed the substitution of a Constituted Attorney for the appellant under Order III Rule 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, following the lack of objection from the respondent.
Headnote:The matter involves applications filed under Order III Rule 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the substitution of a Constituted Attorney for the appellant. The court was also requested to grant an adjournment to allow newly engaged counsel to prepare the matter for hearing. The primary issue was whether the substitution of the Constituted Attorney could be permitted under the procedural laws. The court observed that the respondent had no objection to the substitution, leading to the application of the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. Applications stand disposed of.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for adjournment to allow newly engaged counsel to prepare the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. substitution of constituted attorney under order iii rule 2 and section 151 of the cpc. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
1. Ms. Priya Adlakha, learned counsel for the appellant, states that she has been recently engaged and seeks some time to prepare the matter for hearing. She seeks a short accommodation on that count. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has no objection to such accommodation.
2. Accordingly list on 01.10.2026.
I.A. 12776/2026 in C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 151/2021,
I.A. 12754/2026 in C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 115/2022,
I.A. 12777/2026 in C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 55/2022,
I.A. 12755/2026 in C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 78/2022,
I.A. 12775/2026 in C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 87/2022 (Under Order III Rule 2 of the CPC)
3. These are applications under Order III Rule 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed on behalf of the appellant seeking substitution of Constituted Attorney.
4. Issue notice.
5. Notice is accepted by Mr. Rajat Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 who has no objection in case the applications are allowed.
6. Accordingly, the applications are allowed. Mr. Vishal Vig is substituted as Attorney of the appellant.
7. Applications stand disposed of.
