SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 13434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
DARSHAN SINGH VS. BALDEV SINGH
CS(COMM) 142/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sachin Gupta, Prashansa Singh, Rohit Pradhan, Mahima Chanchalani, Rajat Jain, Ajay, Archna
For the Respondents: Amit Kumar

A court may decree a suit in terms of an amicable settlement reached between parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, provided the terms of the compromise are lawful.

Headnote:The matter involves an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The parties were engaged in a trademark dispute regarding the marks 'REXCIN' and 'REKIN'. The court found that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes through a written settlement agreement. The primary issue was whether the terms of the compromise were lawful and within the contours of the law. The court observed that the settlement terms, which include the mutual retention of respective trademarks and the withdrawal of pending oppositions, are lawful and there is no impediment to decreeing the suit in those terms. The suit is decreed and disposed of alongwith all the pending applications, if any.

Table of Content
1. parties may resolve disputes amicably through a written settlement agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court ensures settlement terms are lawful before decreeing. (Para 5)
3. suit is decreed in terms of the compromise and court fees are refunded. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

O R D E R

I.A. 15528/2026

1. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed jointly by both the parties.

2. Learned counsel for parties state that inter-se disputes have been resolved amicably. The terms of settlement have been reduced into writing and recorded in para 4 (i) to para 4 (x) of the present application, which are reproduced hereunder:

“4. In order to bring quietus to the dispute between the parties and to avoid further litigation, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and have agreed to settle the matter on the following terms and conditions:

i. The Plaintiff shall continue to remain the proprietor of its registered trade mark 'REXCIN' and the statutory rights emanating therefrom.

ii. The Defendant shall continue to remain the proprietor of its registered trade mark 'REKIN' I 'REKIN-SP' and the statutory rights emanating therefrom.

iii. Both parties agree that each party shall retain and continue to use their respective registered trade marks in accordance with law.

iv. The Plaintiff undertakes to withdraw Opposition No. 1171282 filed against the Defendant's trade mark application No. 4102886 for the mark 'REKIN' in Class 35, which is presently pending before the Trade Marks Registry.

v. Both parties further agree that neither party shall challenge, oppose, seek rectification or cancellation of the other party's existing trade mark registrations relating to the marks forming the subject matter of the present dispute.

vi. The parties further agree that the matter is being settled without any order as to costs and without payment of damages by either party.

vii. The parties agree that the present settlement has been entered into voluntarily and amicably, without admission of liability by either party.

viii. The parties agree that upon recording of the present compromise, all disputes between the parties arising out of the subject matter of the present proceedings shall stand fully and finally resolved.

ix. The undertakings contained herein shall be binding upon the parties, their directors, partners, proprietors, successors, assigns, affiliates, licensees, distributors, dealers, agents and all persons acting on their behalf.

x. It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the present memo of compromise and pass a decree in terms of the settlement, and direct return of full court fee to the plaintiff.”

3. The present application has been supported by the affidavits of the authorised representative of the plaintiff as also the defendant.

4. The compliances are stated to be complete.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the settlement and they seem to be lawful. The terms of the settlement appear to be within the contours of Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. There is no impediment in case the suit is decreed in terms thereof.

6. The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement.

7. The decree sheet be drawn up in terms of para 4 (i) to para 4 (x) of the present application.

8. The Court Fees shall be refunded to the plaintiff under the provisions of Section 16 of the Court Fees, 1870 read with Court Fees (Delhi Amendment), 2026 upon completion of all the formalities, as per rules.

9. The suit is decreed and disposed of alongwith all the pending applications, if any.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top