Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 17364
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J
Jewelex India Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Retailer Media Pvt Ltd – Respondent
CS(COMM) 730/2026 | I.A. 20772/2026 | I.A. 17893/2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Pravin Anand, Ashutosh Upadhyaya
For the Respondents: Pawan Bindra, Rahul Dhawan, Vishesh Issar, Vaishali Singh
The court referred the parties to mediation to resolve a trademark infringement dispute after both parties expressed consent.
Headnote:(A) Trademark Infringement - Interim Injunction - Application for ex-parte ad-interim injunction filed to prevent the use of a trademarked banner for an exhibition. (Para 1-3)
(B) Alternative Dispute Resolution - Mediation - Parties' consent to refer the matter to mediation for settlement of the dispute. (Para 8-10)
Issues: Whether the parties should be referred to mediation to resolve the trademark infringement dispute.
O R D E R
% 04.08.2026
I.A. 20772/2026
By way of the present application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the plaintiff seeks ex-parte ad-interim injunction in the terms as was sought vidé I.A. No.17893/2026.
2. Mr. Pravin Anand, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff explains that it has become necessary to file a second application seeking interim orders since just about 05 days after having made a statement before this court that the defendant had no event scheduled under the banner ‘JEWELX’ as was recorded vidé order dated 24.07.2026, it now transpires that the defendant is in fact hosting a Global Business Exchange on Jewellery and Watches exhibition in Hyderabad on 12.09.2026.
3. Mr. Anand submits, that the hosting of the exhibition is both an infringement of the plaintiff’s trade mark as well as a violation of the statement made before this court on 24.07.2026.
4. Mr. Anand submits, that the court had issued notice, without granting any interim relief on 24.07.2026 based on the statement so made.
5. Issue notice.
6. Mr. Pawan Bindra, learned senior counsel appears for the defendant on advance copy; and accepts notice.
7. Mr. Bindra submits, that the statement recorded in para 22 of order dated 24.07.2026 came to be made by reason of certain communication gap between counsel and the company.
8. He submits, that the defendant would be interested in a mediated settlement of the issue.
9. Mr. Anand concurs in the request for reference to mediation.
10. Accordingly, parties are referred to mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, with a request to the learned Organizing Secretary to appoint an appropriate mediator in the matter.
11. Let the mediation be time-bound, to be completed within 10 days.
12. Let the parties approach the Mediation Centre on Friday, i.e. 07th August 2026 at 02:30 p.m. for the above purpose.
13. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Organizing Secretary of the Mediation Centre, for information and compliance.
14. Awaiting the outcome of mediation, list on 19th August 2026.
15. The date before the learned Joint Registrar on 16th October 2026, shall remain as-is.
