SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 17880

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Vikas Mahajan, JJ
Manik Chand – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Respondent
W.P.(C) 13306/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vishhal Saxxenaa
For the Respondents: Sangeeta Chandra, Bhawna

Holders of provisional Certificates of Vending (CoV) are permitted to operate only as mobile vendors and cannot claim fixed stationary sites, especially when such activities cause pedestrian obstruction or violate the terms of the CoV and the Street Vendors Act, 2014.

Headnote:(A) Street Vending - Provisional Certificates of Vending (CoV) - Claim for fixed sites - Holders of provisional CoVs cannot claim fixed stationary sites as the certificates are subject to specific terms and conditions restricting them to mobile vending and prohibiting encroachment. (Para 7)

(B) Public Nuisance and Encroachment - Footpath obstruction - Vending activities that encroach upon pedestrian areas or cause traffic congestion are impermissible and subject to removal. (Para 6, 8)

(C) Statutory Compliance - Town Vending Committee - Rights of vendors are subject to the plans formulated by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. (Para 10)

Issues: Whether holders of provisional Certificates of Vending are entitled to the allotment of fixed stationary vending sites.

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

(Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on behalf of the 42 Petitioners, who claim to be having provisional Certificates of Vending (hereinafter, ‘CoV’). The prayer in this writ petition is as under:-

(i) pass an order, direction and/or any other appropriate Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to indicate the exact site of the petitioners in the column of site where vending is permitted to the petitioners;

(ii) pass an order, direction and/or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the Respondents in not indicating the correct site in the column of vending certificate which is illegal, unjustifiedand contrary to thedirectionsofthisHon'ble Court; and

(iii) pass such other or further Order/s as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

3. However, a perusal of the petition would show that only one affidavit of Shri Manik Chand has been filed and only one provisional CoV of Mr. Jagdamba Prasad bearing URI No. 6062065 has been placed on record.

4. There was a specific direction vide order dated 3rd February, 2025 by which all the Petitioners were directed to file their personal affidavits. The said direction reads:

“1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners’ states that petitioner no.1 has died and his legal heirs are required to be brought on record.

2. List before the concerned Registrar on the date already fixed, that is 13.05.2025. In the meanwhile, all petitioners shall file their personal affidavits affirming the contents of the present petition.

3. We clarify that this court has not passed any interim order in the present petition and the pendency of the same shall not be construed as interdicting the respondents in any manner from performing their duties.”

However, no affidavits have been filed in this regard till date.

5. The stand of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘MCD’) is clear that these Petitioners are at best mobile vendors and they do not have any identified stationary site which can be allotted to them.

6. Heard. The photographs which are placed on record would also show that the Petitioners are not vending as mobile vendors but stationary shops and have encroached upon the footpath, the walking area and also creating traffic congestion in the area. The vending sites are also not being maintained in a clean and hygienic manner by the Petitioners.

7. A perusal of the prayer would show that the Petitioners want to claim fixed sites of vending under provisional CoVs. In the opinion of this Court, this cannot be permitted. The provisional CoVs are all attached with terms and conditions which are applicable to all CoV holders. The said terms and conditions are extracted below:

“1) No other permanent and long selling certificate is available with the vendor.

2) Vending certificate shall not be transferable.

3.)Itshallbeessentialforthevendortoadheretoselling time and zone fixed by TVC and not local authority.

4.)Thevendorshallnotinanymannergiveonrent/lease of vending certificate.

5.)The vendor shall not be suffering from any contagious disease at present.

6.)The vendor shall keep the selling site/zone and nearby area cleaned and shall take care of the health of public.

7.)The vendor shall keep one copy of the vending certificate at the main of the vending site, at the time of need original documents shall be produced before TVC/concerned Inspector.

8.)The street vendor shall take all efforts to see that there is no obstruction in passage of pedestrian and traffic.

9.)The vendor shall not sell any dangerous and polluted items. It shall also be ensured that the products sold to the public and the services provided is in conformity with the norms fixed by the Public Health Department and Security norms.

10.) The street vendors shall not encroach or carry on any illegal activity.

11.) The mobil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top