SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 22255

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J
B L Agro Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Yash Parashar – Respondent
CS(COMM) 659/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rajesh Sharma
For the Respondents: Kapil Wadhwa, Raghav Wadhwa, Priyanshi Bhageria

The court framed issues to determine if the use of 'MAMA NOURISH' infringes upon or passes off the mark 'NOURISH', and whether the plaintiff holds exclusive rights to 'NOURISH' in Classes 29, 30, and 31.

Headnote:(A) Trademark Infringement - Use of mark “MAMA NOURISH” vs “NOURISH” - Determination of whether the defendants' use of the mark “MAMA NOURISH” constitutes infringement of the plaintiff's mark “NOURISH”.

(B) Passing Off - Use of mark “MAMA NOURISH” - Determination of whether the defendants' use of the mark “MAMA NOURISH” amounts to passing off of the mark “NOURISH”.

(C) Exclusivity of Mark - Class 29, 30 and 31 - Determination of whether the plaintiff is entitled to exclusivity over the mark “NOURISH” in the specified classes.

Issues: Whether the defendants' use of the mark 'MAMA NOURISH' amounts to infringement or passing off of the mark 'NOURISH', and whether the plaintiff is entitled to exclusivity over the mark in Classes 29, 30, and 31.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • intellectual property
    • trademark
      • infringement (Para 1)
      • passing off (Para 1)
  • practice and procedure
    • civil procedure
      • interim applications (Para 3)
      • issues framing (Para 1)

Table of Contents

1. Trademark infringement and passing off claim regarding use of marks containing NOURISH. (Para 1 )

2. Whether defendant's use of MAMA NOURISH infringes or passes off plaintiff's mark NOURISH; plaintiff's entitlement to exclusivity. (Para 1 )

3. Matter adjourned for further proceedings; interim application listed for consideration. (Para 2 , 3 )

O R D E R

1. Bearing in mind the pleadings made by the parties, the following issues are framed for consideration:

(i) Whether the defendants’ use of the mark “MAMA NOURISH”amounts to infringement of the mark “NOURISH”? (OPP)

(ii) Whether the defendants’ use of the mark “MAMA NOURISH”amounts to passing off of the mark “NOURISH”? (OPP)

(iii) Whether the plaintiff is not entitled to exclusivity over the mark “NOURISH” in Class 29, 30 and 31? (OPD)

(iv) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of damages? (OPP)

(v) Reliefs.

2. Let the matter to continue in JR Court for further proceedings in accordance with the extant rules on 02.11.2026.

I.A. 35728/2024 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC)

3. List for consideration by this Court on 02.02.2027.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top