SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 37817

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI


CNR No. DLHC010541902026

W.P.(CRL) 3516/2026

CRL.M.A. 35231/2026


PRADEEP BANSAL & ORS. .....Petitioners


Through: Mr. Nitesh Mehra, Mr. Kunal Raj, Ms. Hitaakshi Mehra and Ms. Riya Jain, Advs.


versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents


Through: Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Adv. for Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) for the State

SI Jatesh Kalal, PS Adarsh Nagar


CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA


06.11.2026


MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J


NOVEMBER 6, 2026/msh/AM

O R D E R

06.11.2026 CRL.M.A. 35231/2026 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 3516/2026

3. This is a petition filed for seeking the following relief:

“a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read for the expeditious and time-bound disposal of the application dated 08.04.2024 seeking vacation of the interim stay granted vide order dated 01.12.2023 in Complaint Case No. 1964/2023, titled “Nancy Bansal v. Rajat Bansal & Ors.”, pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Mahila Court)-02, North District, Delhi;”

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners have filed an application seeking vacation of the stay order dated 01.12.2023. He states that the arguments in this application were heard on 06.01.2026 and the matter has remained pending for pronouncement of the order on the said application since 22.04.2026.

5. Issue notice. Learned ASC (Crl.) accepts notice.

6. This Court has perused the order sheet filed on record and more specifically the order sheet 22.07.2025 when the concerned Judge has been presiding over the Court and continued till date. This Court is unable to discern from the order sheet, the reason for the non-pronouncement of the order.

7. The Registry is directed to seek a report from the concerned Judge as well as from the concerned CJM and the District Judge with respect to the averments made in this petition, as regards the reasons for non- pronouncement of the order, and the send the report two (2) days prior to the next date of hearing.

8. The learned CJM and the learned District Judge, in their report, will also explain the context of the remark ‘This Court is working with only one stenographer and having pendency of more than 4500 cases’ as it appears on the order sheet of the learned Trial Court and similar, such remarks appearing in the further orders of the concerned judge.

9. The registry is directed to send a copy of this order through Special Messenger to the concerned District Judge, the concerned CJM and the concerned Judge.

10. List on 03.12.2026 in the supplementary list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top